Heat turned up on Philippine coal deals

“Definitely, their [ERC] decision on the extension was unanimous, but the question is why 20 years? The contract is long, you have to look at the entire industry,” Senator Sherwin Gatchalian said.
Gatchalian said efforts should be made to make power cheaper, rather than making it more expensive, particularly when renewable alternatives like solar are available.
He said he was informed that Meralco just went into a 3.5 peso per kilowatt hour contract for solar, while the contract for coal is about 6 pesos per kilowatt hour.
“So, the difference is big and yet we would commit ourselves to 6 pesos per kilowatt hour in the next 20 years?” he said.
Gatchalian, who chairs the Senate Committee on Energy, noted the global trend of decreasing solar energy prices over time as a result of competitive bidding regimes instituted by other countries in their renewable energy sectors.
Various groups have questioned the ERC’s move to approve Meralco’s long-term agreements with seven power generation companies that they have called “sweetheart deals” with subsidiaries or co-owned companies.
These consumer groups, including Sanlakas, met with Gatchalian in his Senate office on Thursday asking for a Senate investigation on the issue.
The same group also led a rally on Thursday morning in front of the offices of Meralco Power Generation at the Ortigas Centre in Pasig City to protest the power sale agreements.
Asked whether his Senate committee intends to investigate these alleged midnight deals of Meralco, Gatchalian said: “Congress is now investigating that. We are monitoring that quite well, quite closely.”
In the House of Representatives, Congressman Carlos Isagani Zarate of Bayan Muna had claimed that Meralco’s PSAs were rigged when the November 6, 2015, start-up date of the Competitive Selection Process (CSP) for power contracting was “mysteriously” moved to April 30, 2016, by the ERC.
He said this act kept the door open for entry of over 3,500 MW of Meralco’s seven power supply contracts without the required bidding or competitive selection.
The CSP subjects all power supply contracts to competitive selection to be administered by a designated third party, institute transparency and enforce accountability in the power contracting of distribution utilities which, until CSP, was mostly done through negotiated bilateral contracts where the captive customers had no say or participation.