The logic of a cull is obvious: no canines, no attacks
So Eric Bahrt considers my suggestion of a dog cull illogical.
On a daily basis, countless people are attacked by these worthless animals throughout the country.
Eric, I pose a simple question: If there were no dogs, how many dog attacks would there be?
Consider this: If the owner of the dogs had controlled his dangerous animals there would have been no incident.
The root of the problem therefore is the dogs and the antisocial pervert owner.
Neither have a place in civil society.
Ergo, destroy both. Hardly illogical.
Enough of dogs (and Eric)
