By PAREZ LOHASAN
Nong Chik Police Station superintendent Colonel Thompong Petchpirun made the recommendation after learning that his 37-year-old subordinate, Pol Lieutenant Meechai Chorsom, was implicated in the robbery.
“The robbery took place at a time when he was taking leave to visit his family,” Thompong said yesterday.
He said Meechai was usually polite and quiet and a good worker. “I don’t know what has gone wrong,” Thompong said.
Meechai, a deputy inspector at Pattani province’s Nong Chik Police Station, was detained as soon as he reported to work at the police station on Friday night. He has been charged with robbing a gold shop in Nakhon Si Thammarat’s Thung Yai district last Wednesday.
Thung Yai police used CCTV footage to seek an arrest warrant for Meechai. The robber made off with 20-baht weight of gold necklaces worth about Bt400,000.
A source from the investigation team said police had tracked down the owner of a motorcycle used in the robbery, who told police that Meechai had borrowed his motorcycle and returned it to him a few days ago.
After the arrest, police escorted Meechai to his house where clothes and a cap allegedly used in the robbery were found.
Pol Maj-General Damras Wiriyakul, a deputy chief with the Provincial Police Region 8, yesterday headed to Nong Chik Police Station to handle Meechai’s case.
Meechai was interrogated for more than five hours before being transferred from the station.
A further interrogation will take place at the Thing Yai Police Station in Nakhon Si Thammarat province.
Pattani police chief Pol Maj-General Piyawat Chalermsri said Meechai had denied any wrongdoing.
“At this point, I have set up three committees already,” he said.
The first committee would investigate Meechai’s alleged criminal offences, Piyawat said. If he is found guilty, Meechai will be sacked, although technically it is possible that he could still receive his pension.
The second committee will check whether the gun used in the robbery was issued by a state agency and if it had been reported as missing.
The third committee, meanwhile, will determine whether Meechai’s supervisor should also be held responsible for negligence in relation to the case.