By The Nation
If the plot became privately owned it could possibly fetch billions of baht, given its nice location. Private investors would be keen to buy the plot from Chuan Pukaoluan, who has long fought with the Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation (DNP) over the plot.
The Court of Primary Instance initially ruled in favour of Chuan, who produced land-rights documents and pictures to back a claim that he owned and used the plot before it was declared a part of Hat Noppharat Thara–Mu Ko Phi Phi National Park in 1967.
The DNP appealed and enlisted the help of experts in verifying the age of coconut trees on the plot.
Experts from the Chumphon Horticultural Research Centre randomly examined 12 coconut trees on the site, and analyses showed the oldest was just 45 years old. Chuan’s claim that coconut trees were planted there before the national park was established was no longer convincing.
“Through special techniques, we can accurately identity the age of a tree,” said the centre’s representative, Supatra Lertwannakiat.
The Department of Special Investigation (DSI) has helped the DNP in finding new techniques for the court battle.
On Thursday, the Appeal Court found the DNP evidence carried more weight and ruled in their favour.
“I feel relieved now that we won the case,” said Hat Noppharat Thara–Mu Ko Phi Phi National Park chief Worapoj Lomlim on Friday.
He said he could not sleep at all on Wednesday night because of anxiety.
DNP director-general Thanya Netithammakun said the Poda ruling marked the first time his agency had won in the Appeal Court.
He said even though Chuan could still petition to the Supreme Court, it would be difficult for Chuan to find anything to rebut the DNP evidence.