Court rules independent candidates for Senate ‘not unconstitutional’

The Court explained that the cause in question was merely provisional, not permanent.
The clause stipulates candidates for the Senate must be either “independent” or represent a professional association.
Opponents including the Constitution Drafting Commission said the clause violated the military-drafted Constitution, which only recognises members of professional guilds as legitimate Senate candidates.
The controversy led to some members of the National Legislative Assembly (NLA) seeking the Court’s ruling to ensure the bill’s legality and prevent any future problems arising regarding the clause. The NLA was criticised loudly for the move by those concerned it would further delay an election.
The Court’s ruling that the clause is in harmony with the Constitution means the NLA can now proceed to submit the bill to the prime minister to present for royal endorsement.
Two more bills – on the election of MPs and on political parties – have been sent to the Constitutional Court for a ruling on their legality.
The Court yesterday announced it would deliver a judgement on the MPs election bill next Wednesday.
Contentious points in the bills are whether it is constitutional to ban eligible voters who fail to vote from taking up any political office, and provision of assistance for the disabled at polling booths.
On controversy surrounding the junta amending the political party law to set deadlines for party arrangements, the Court said it would discuss the issue next Wednesday and give a verdict later.