If Russia is fighting Islamic extremists, why ally with Iran?
It is refreshing to read some common sense, albeit a little partisan, in yesterday’s letter from Russian Ambassador Kirill Barsky. It affirms Russia’s belief in the sovereignty of the nation state while condemning globalist illegal regime change.
The criticised missile strike ordered by President Trump should be seen in the context of his unavoidable immersion in the swamp legacy of the previous regime. That in itself is in some mitigation of his actions based on the intelligence from 17 somewhat doubtful agencies he inherited. However, Presidents Putin and Trump share one essential principle: the rights the sovereign state and the need to defend them. (On this point it is advisable to ignore the globalist mainstream media and research the truth relating to Ukraine and Crimea.) This shared principle explains why there is such enmity towards the European Union, under whose control its 28 member-states have surrendered their sovereignty by acceding to the Lisbon Treaty.
The US missile strike was clearly a one-off protest against the use of chemical weapons, not an attack on a sovereign state. It does not make sense that the Syrian president would use chemical weapons against his own people. But President Trump has to rely on his intelligence agencies whose allegiance was previously to a government intent on foreign regime change and the globalist new world order.
The anti-Bashar al-Assad rebels, who are now the IS caliphate, were armed by the Obama administration with a large cache from Benghazi following the murder in 2012 of the US ambassador in Libya, Christopher Stevens. The two previous regimes in the USA are responsible for the current devastation across the Middle East as a result of their policy of internationally illegal regime change. Under the previous despots, in countries with little knowledge and no experience of democracy, there was stability and control, albeit authoritarian. Had the USA not removed Saddam Hussein and supported President al-Assad rather than the Islamic fundamentalist rebels, Syria’s and Iraq’s sovereignty would have been secured. Above all, the world would now be a safer place with the fundamentalists restrained rather than metastasising globally.
The same Islamic fundamentalists wrecked Iran in 1979 and that brings into question Moscow’s alliance with Tehran. Islamic insurgents continually threaten Russia and the very sovereignty of nation states. Perhaps His Excellency could explain.
JC Wilcox
