Oh, THAT Noah Zarke
Jenny Moxham is at it again, I see, firing off cheap infantile shots questioning the identity of letter writer Noah Zarke, which has got absolutely nothing to do with the issues. Same exhausted, immature diatribe, different day.
What I noticed a while ago however with the symbolic nature of the identity in question is the play on words he uses (Noah’s ark), an allegorical reference that Moxham is entirely ignorant of, as her dime-a-dozen upchuck emphatically shows. Even if or when she Googles it, I doubt very much that she has the intellectual wherewithal to understand the concept Zarke uses. Think of animals going in two by two, and take it from there, if that's possible.
In any event, full marks to Zarke for standing up to this tiresome barrage of cynical duplicity from the vego-droners.
As a way of avoiding hers and others’ similarly offensive polemics, it is as crude as usual from this contributor, and hardly effective seeing as she obviously missed the point of Zarke’s thinking. Moxham really should know very well that she should take to her own affairs, and leave those of others alone. Eating meat is legal whether she likes it or not, and busybodies like her obviously don’t like decent people thinking for themselves. Being a carnivore is not a criminal offence, and that’s what the likes of Moxham can’t abide. Live with the moral right of other people eating meat (what does she think of Halal? She’s unlikely to answer that – a bit tricky too, eh?
Dr Frank
