THURSDAY, March 28, 2024
nationthailand

‘SLAPP’ given junta critics carries a sting

‘SLAPP’ given junta critics carries a sting

By denying scholars free speech, the government is only hurting itself – and further damaging Thailand’s reputation

The ruling military junta is using a tactic known as “SLAPP” (“Strategic Lawsuits against Public Participation”) to gag intellectuals and prominent public figures. Basically, it drops them into legal quicksand that consumes all the time and energy they might otherwise devote to criticising the dearth of democratic freedoms.
Esteemed historian Charnvit Kasetsiri, a former rector of Thammasat University, was summoned to hear charges against him on Wednesday, as was Anusorn Unno, dean of sociology and anthropology at Thammasat. Both men face prison terms if convicted. 
Charnvit, whose academic work is internationally recognised, has had to clear his calendar so he can prepare for the legal battle. He is accused of violating the Computer Crimes Act for allegedly sharing on Facebook a widely circulated news report about Naraporn, the wife of junta leader and Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha, carrying “a Bt2-million Hermes handbag”. 
Charnvit allegedly added the undeniably harmless comments “Thai leaders must look expensive not cheap” and “How much is it?” In no way did these comments, even if made, damage the interests of the country or its people, but merely helped point out that, as the wife of the premier, Naraporn is also a public figure and should be subject to scrutiny, including about her expenditures. The government, however, has denied she owns such an accessory, so the Technology Crime Suppression Division has decided that sharing the “fake news” was in violation of the Computer Crimes Act. Charnvit has expressed confidence he did nothing wrong “legally or morally” and believes he can make a case for freedom of expression. If he can’t, he might be jailed for up to five years and fined Bt100,000, or both.
Professor Anusorn, coordinator of the Thai Academic Network for Civil Rights, is charged with violating the junta’s ban on public gatherings of five or more persons, stemming from the “We Walk” march for civil rights and a series of seminars held at universities across Thailand. The charge comes in spite of the Administrative Court’s Friday decision to grant legal protection to participants in We Walk and members of the organising People Go Network. The police were ordered to let the marchers continue on to Khon Kaen as planned. The walk is scheduled to end on February 17.
Nevertheless, police summoned Anusorn and seven others involved in the We Walk campaign to report for booking tomorrow. They each face up to six months in prison, a Bt10,000 fine, or both.
Even if the court’s intent in 
protecting the marchers and organisers is respected and the 
defendants, if convicted, receive far more lenient punishment, they should not be facing such charges at all. Their activities posed no threat to the junta and did not disturb the peace. On the contrary, again, their actions should be seen as being 
of benefit to the public.
Instead, we have what appears an obvious attempt on the part of the junta to intimidate these scholars and stop them criticising military rule and the slow progress in organising elections. Charnvit, Anusorn and the rest are being cruelly harassed and could face long legal battles that will divert their considerable talents away from the academic contributions they make to the country. The public, the news media and the international community should be in a fury over such blatant intimidation, and venting their anger at the junta.

RELATED
nationthailand