
The Supreme Court yesterday dismissed appeals by two executives, for whom the court also issued arrest warrants because they failed again to show up to hear the final judgement. As a result, legal execution will be according to the Appeal Court’s ruling which initially jailed the two for 120,945 years each.
However the two convicted executives – identified as former member of the Blissher Inter Group board, Angsunee Pattananithi, and former co-founder Saengthong Sae-kim – would serve only 20 years each, if caught, because Thai law only allows a maximum punishment of 20 years jail for this type of crime.
The final verdict was read in the absence of Angsunee and Saengthong – both of who failed to show up for the previously-slated final verdict reading in October.
The Office of Attorney-General’s Economic Crime Division brought this case of public fraud to court in 1994 against five defendants – Blissher Inter Group and its four former executives – Angsunee, former co-founder and shareholder Parachawan Benjamasmongkol, Saengthong and Silom branch manager Annop Kunsawate.
The division claimed the defendants couldn’t provide the rewards as promised. The company’s promised returns were also of a higher rate than the legal interest rate.
In the lawsuit, the defendants, from July 1991-February 1994, allegedly duped people into investing money in this “time-sharing” business that boasted it would provide members free accommodation at luxurious hotels and resorts for four days a year throughout a 20-year membership period.
They charged members a Bt30,000 plus a Bt2,500 maintenance fee per year for a silver card membership and Bt60,000 plus Bt4,500 for a gold card membership. The members could also become the company’s “salespeople” if they paid it a Bt1,500 salesperson fee per year. They could earn a Bt5,000 commission for every new member they brought into the scheme.
The primary court gave Angsunee, Saengthong and Annop a 120,945-year jail term each - while acquitting the firm and Parachawan, finding they weren’t involved in the company policy-making. The Court of Appeals in January 2013 upheld the previous ruling, which led to Angsunee and Saengthong’s appeals to the Supreme Court.