However, in 1958 the Brookings Institute in USA decreed that should any intelligently created artifacts be discovered in the impending exploration of our solar system, those discoveries would not be disseminated to the public, as these would destabilise belief systems, governments, etc. Surely if that also refers to this mission, then we will learn nothing.
This decree affected the Mars Orbiter and Viking missions’ results, as the photos, shot on the Malin Space Science cameras over several decades have been selectively airbrushed and degraded to hide what the cameras saw. Much did slip through the censors, and millions have now noted the intelligently crafted structures, geometric buildings, mechanical parts, etc, on Mars. This research can be found on sites such as enterprisemission.com that belongs to Richard Hoagland, an ex-science adviser to NASA.
If any of this would be “accepted” by mainstream science, then their concept of evolution would have to be re-written, the religions would suffer, and the demand for real clean energy would arise. It would also expose the past censorship.
Before you scream fraud, consider that dozens of investigators have attempted to debunk Billy Meier over several decades, but failed. The US and Swiss governments closely monitored Meier during the late 1970s early 1980s with radar vans, air radar and with the Swiss Air Force, during his over 130 ET contacts.
The fact NASA now poses the 2 questions, with their publicity gag still in place, doesn’t fool everybody.
Thomas Turk
Phuket