Thai temple donations put at 54.4bn baht a year amid audit gaps

SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2026
Thai temple donations put at 54.4bn baht a year amid audit gaps

Thai temple donations face scrutiny over accounting gaps, while an annual giving estimate of 54.4 billion baht draws on older data

  • An estimate based on 2018 giving data puts annual donations to Thai temples at 54.417 billion baht.
  • Research identifies concentrated control over temple finances, inconsistent accounting and limited public disclosure.
  • Central Investigation Bureau police arrested Wat Phutthaisawan’s abbot on September 10, 2026, over allegations involving approximately 92 million baht in temple funds.
  • Supreme Sangha Council accounting requirements took effect on October 1, 2025, covering withdrawal authorisation and annual financial reporting.

Donation money is central to scrutiny of Thai temple finances, with an estimate based on 2018 giving data putting annual contributions at 54.417 billion baht. The figure provides a historical indication of the scale of public giving, rather than an audited total for 2026. 

The handling of temple funds returned to public attention after Central Investigation Bureau (CIB) police arrested Phra Wachirayan, also known as Luang Pho Atichot Dhammavaro, then abbot of Wat Phutthaisawan in Ayutthaya, on September 10, 2026. The allegations involve approximately 92 million baht and raise questions about how money given by the public is received, safeguarded and accounted for.

Donation estimates underline the need for transparent accounts

A separate, undated estimate puts the combined assets of temples nationwide at more than 1.35 trillion baht. Annual donations and accumulated assets measure different things, and neither figure represents money established to have been stolen. Temple finance estimates

The National Institute of Development Administration (NIDA) has examined weaknesses in temple financial management, including the concentration of authority in abbots and inconsistent accounting practices. A NIDA review published in May 2025 revisited research conducted in 2012 and described financial records that were retained within temples without adequate public disclosure. NIDA’s review of temple governance

Limited independent scrutiny leaves donors with insufficient information about temple income, expenditure and assets. Weaknesses in temple donation accounting and oversight make it harder to establish whether money has reached its intended destination and been spent for its stated purpose. 

Five prominent cases between 2022 and 2026 illustrate recurring concerns about personal relationships, access to temple money and financial scrutiny. Monastic disciplinary action and criminal proceedings can follow the same events, but leaving the monkhood does not establish criminal guilt.

Five cases reveal different outcomes for temple money

2022: A 600,000-baht withdrawal from Wat Pen Yat

Pongsakorn Chankaeo, formerly known as Phra Kato, admitted withdrawing 600,000 baht while serving as acting abbot of Wat Pen Yat. The withdrawal came to public attention following revelations about a relationship with a woman identified as Tong. Pongsakorn said the money went to an intermediary to deal with the situation.

Pongsakorn left the monkhood, and the 600,000 baht was returned to the temple. The Public Sector Anti-Corruption Commission examined whether the use of temple money breached criminal law; repayment did not by itself settle that question.

2023–2024: The Wat Pa Thammakhiri case reached a conviction

Crime Suppression Division police investigated Khom Kongkaeo, formerly Phra Ajarn Khom Aphiwaro, and associates in 2023 over the misuse of money belonging to Wat Pa Thammakhiri in Nakhon Ratchasima and the concealment of assets.

The Central Criminal Court for Corruption and Misconduct Cases convicted Khom on March 20, 2024. The court imposed sentences totalling 468 years across 78 counts, with imprisonment capped at 50 years under the applicable sentencing limit. 

2025–2026: Wat Rai Khing allegations were followed by a prison sentence

Police initially alleged in 2025 that more than 300 million baht from Wat Rai Khing had been channelled through personal accounts and an online gambling network. Yaem Intrangkrungkao, formerly Phra Dharma Wachiranuwat, was the temple’s abbot and ecclesiastical governor of Region 14.

Yaem surrendered after an arrest warrant was issued and was removed from his administrative positions. The National Office of Buddhism stressed the presumption of innocence during the investigation.

The Wat Rai Khing case subsequently reached a judgment. Thai PBS World reported that the Central Criminal Court for Corruption and Misconduct Cases sentenced Yaem to 50 years on April 21, 2026, for conspiring to embezzle temple funds and misconduct in office, and ordered the return of 28 million baht. 

2025: The “Golf” investigation involved 385 million baht in account turnover

Police investigated a woman identified as Golf over alleged relationships with several monks and associated financial transactions. Nine monks had left the monkhood by July 16, 2025, while other individuals remained under investigation.

Police reported approximately 385 million baht moving through Golf’s accounts over three years. That figure describes account turnover; it does not establish that all the money came from monks, consisted of donations or was misappropriated.

2026: Wat Phutthaisawan’s abbot was arrested over approximately 92 million baht

Police arrested Atichot under a warrant from the Region 1 Criminal Court for Corruption and Misconduct Cases. The allegations concerned the misappropriation of temple property, misconduct in office and conspiracy to launder money. Police also alleged a sexual relationship with a woman inside his monastic quarters.

Atichot relinquished his monastic status after being taken to Ayutthaya’s deputy provincial ecclesiastical chief and was transferred to CIB headquarters for questioning. A woman whom police linked to the movement of funds was also detained for questioning.

Police searches recovered more than 100 million baht in cash, alongside gold and other property, with the combined assets valued at more than 200 million baht. Those recoveries must be distinguished from the approximately 92 million baht covered by the allegations. Police said further investigation would establish which assets belonged personally to the suspect and which belonged to the temple. 

Temple cash and withdrawal rules already require safeguards

Thailand’s 2021 ministerial regulation requires temple money exceeding 100,000 baht to be deposited in a bank account in the temple’s name, or safeguarded through another method prescribed by the Supreme Sangha Council. The regulation also requires donated charitable funds to be managed according to donors’ wishes. 

The Supreme Sangha Council’s Resolution 495/2568, adopted on June 20, 2025, introduced further banking and accounting requirements effective from October 1, 2025. The principal requirements include:

Temple bank accounts: Accounts must identify the temple, without adding an individual’s name.

Withdrawal authority: At least three authorised persons must be designated. Withdrawals require two of three signatures, including the abbot’s every time.

Financial records: Temples must record receipts and payments and prepare monthly summaries.

Annual submission: Income, expenditure and balance reports must reach the National Office of Buddhism or the relevant provincial office by January 20 of the following year. Supporting records must remain available for inspection.

Supreme Sangha Council resolution

Implementation and access to records remain central to financial accountability. Issuing accounting requirements does not establish that every temple consistently records transactions or makes financial information accessible to donors.

The council resolution authorises the National Office of Buddhism to coordinate appropriate examinations with bodies including the State Audit Office, Royal Thai Police and Anti-Money Laundering Office. The examinations can cover temple receipts, expenditure, balances and supporting documents, with findings reported to the council.