
Thailand’s political index fell to 3.63 out of 10 in August, down from 3.71 in July, as public ratings declined across 23 of the 25 areas measured by Suan Dusit Poll.
Opposition performance and public participation were the only indicators to improve. They also received the two highest August scores, at 4.28 and 4.20 respectively.
Efforts to tackle drugs and influential figures ranked last at 3.00, followed by anti-corruption and transparency work at 3.18 and goods prices at 3.19. The prime minister’s performance and the government’s performance received identical scores of 3.57.
Suan Dusit University surveyed 2,107 people nationwide through online and field interviews from August 25-28, 2026. Respondents rated 25 indicators intended to measure confidence in different aspects of Thai politics, with each carrying a maximum score of 10.
The August indicators, ranked from highest to lowest using only the latest month’s results, were:
Pornpan Buathong, President of Suan Dusit Poll, attributed the overall decline to continuing economic and social problems, corruption, disasters and security concerns.
Although the government had responded and introduced measures, she noted that clear results had yet to emerge in several areas.
Pornpan linked the opposition’s stronger rating to its continuing scrutiny of the government and political communication. These activities, together with continued public engagement, helped make opposition performance and public participation the only two indicators to improve.
Anutin Charnvirakul was named the government-side politician with the most prominent role during August, receiving 31.94% of responses.
The full government-side ranking was:
Rukchanok Srinork topped the poll’s opposition-side ranking with 32.46%, ahead of Parit Wacharasindhu on 22.68%.
The opposition-side results were:
Respondents selected the Thais Helping Thais Plus programme as their most favoured government achievement of August, with 57.60%.
The government-side results were:
Scrutiny of government budget spending was the opposition activity most favoured by respondents, at 39.74%.
The opposition-side results were:
Pinyo Khoowattanasenee of Suan Dusit University’s Bachelor of Laws programme interpreted the widespread fall in scores as evidence of what he described as a crisis of public confidence in Thailand’s political institutions.
He highlighted the particularly low ratings for tackling corruption, improving transparency and addressing drugs and influential figures.
Pinyo also viewed the matching 3.57 scores for the prime minister and the government as a sign of weakening legal legitimacy for the executive.
Although Thais Helping Thais Plus was the most popular government achievement in the survey, he argued that its approval rating had not offset poor assessments of goods prices, the cost of living and the wider economy.
The relatively strong public-participation score showed that people remained politically engaged, he added, but also represented a legal and political warning.
“If the government structure lacks transparency and the rule of law, public faith in the system of government and Thailand’s political institutions will inevitably decline,” he said.