South Korean President Park Geun-hye’s meetings with the leaders of the two superpowers, which preceded and followed the Obama-Xi talks within a month, seemed to have helped consolidate the momentum toward the resolution of the issue that has threatened security on the Korean Peninsula and in Northeast Asia for decades.
As cautioned by some experts, however, the road to North Korea’s denuclearisation remains bumpy. With the North having taken no significant steps to demonstrate its sincerity, Washington and Beijing are divided over whether to resume the six-party talks aimed at dismantling Pyongyang’s nuclear arsenal. The dialogue has been stalled since 2008.
China has said the multilateral discussion that also involves the two Koreas, Japan and Russia still remains an important platform to persuade North Korea to give up its nuclear programmes and settle other relevant security issues. The US has followed South Korea’s stance that it is meaningless to reopen the long-stalled talks unless North Korea shows a clear willingness to abandon its nuclear arms through concrete actions.
Seoul and Washington apparently want Beijing to put further pressure on Pyongyang to withdraw its demand for recognition as a nuclear power and return to credible and authentic negotiations aimed at its denuclearisation. While having managed to push North Korea towards resumption of the talks, China seems to have had difficulty getting its intractable neighbour to change its stance on denuclearisation. Recent satellite images suggested that the North may have begun reactivating its nuclear reactor in Yongbyon.
In a recent move aimed at creating a breakthrough, China has proposed holding a gathering of officials and academics from nations involved in the six-party negotiations in Beijing next week. Seoul and Washington have also remained cautious on sending senior government officials to the informal forum.
The schism between the US and China is worrisome as it could send the wrong signal to North Korea. The two superpowers should strengthen efforts to coordinate their stances on the multilateral framework for resolving Pyongyang’s nuclear problem.
Certainly, there is the possibility that the resumption of the six-party talks without verifying the North’s sincere attitude would only give it more time to further advance its nuclear programmes while circumventing international sanctions. But the US also seems too distracted by the crisis in Syria and domestic matters to actively take on the North Korean issue. At this juncture, Seoul may need to come forward to assume a more proactive role in pushing forward the process of settling the nuclear stand-off with Pyongyang.