“The final passage of the bill should be put on hold until an amicable solution on how to proceed with charter chage can be found,” he said.
Banharn said his party welcomed the verdict in which the Constitution Court ruled against disbanding parties involved in sponsoring the bill.
But at the same time, he disagreed with the idea of amending each charter provision at a time in lieu of introducing a new charter, arguing this would lead to confusion because the anti-amendment camp might still try to block the charter change by inititiating a new round of judicial review.
The Nation