But from the other side of its mouth, the same government vows that the situation hasn’t improved much, and for the 27th time, it’s seeking a three-month extension.
I suggest that the southern situation is basically an internal matter, not one of invasion by foreigners – and thus is a police matter, with the military playing a supporting, not a main, role – since the government’s mission is one of reconciliation, not of eradication. I suggest that to be anywhere near effective, the authorities involved must be at least conversant in the local language (and know the local culture fairly well) – which means that those in command and in contact with the residents must be from the region. I suggest that the most important key performance indicator should be results of third-party opinion polls on how local residents feel towards Thailand as a whole, their provincial administration and governor, the national government, etc.
If what I suggest above is in fact true, then the Emergency Decree is counter-productive, for it’s more suited for those occupying an enemy country, not for those who would save their fellow countrymen. For example, it justifies any (note: any) action undertaken under orders – including killing, as at Krue Se (32 bodies) and Tak Bai (82 bodies), for which no soldier has been held accountable, sending the message: southern lives are cheap.
Surely we should first find out if the people to be governed by the Emergency Decree feel it’s necessary to their well-being before putting them under this iron fist for the 27th time. Let the decree expire now, and ask ABAC, Suan Dusit, NIDA, etc, to run a credible opinion poll on this matter over the next few months.
Burin Kantabutra