Yingluck claims anti-graft body meddling with her witnesses

The real tragedy is that after Pheu Thai Party win the next election and assume power again, they won’t go after the clowns currently persecuting them.
Smarter Than You
I hope they do – if there is dirt, please use it. The more people going down (PTP included) for corruption, the better. 
This is unfortunately how justice works here. In power: do as you please and no worries since nobody will go after you. Out of power: crimes get exposed. That is why they were hanging on to power trying to get re-elected fast to cover stuff up. Nobody wants to lose power, because then they lose protection too. Goes for all those who are involved in corruption. 
robblock
What she is saying is that fresh probes could be construed as harassment of defence witnesses. If the timing of these fresh probes coincides with testimony, she could associate them with coercion, intentional or unintentional. She may have a point. Sadly, the courts and any law enforcement agency are political pawns in Thailand. There is no love of fairness in Thai government, just the love of self-fulfilment. 
yellowboat
If somebody wants to stand up in court and define their involvement in a policy known to be corrupt, their testimony may well be fresh/additional evidence of their complicity. Failure to act on such evidence would be negligence (you know, what she is charged with).
Any attempt to refute such evidence would result in perjury charges (you know, what she wasn’t charged with, because the definition was temporarily changed).
halloween
ThaiVisa