
Government Spokesman Sansern Kaewkamnerd said that the amendment aimed to empower state mechanisms to effectively deal with all kinds of security threats, notably natural disasters, rather than controlling the population for political purposes as widely understood.
Really enjoy reading what this guy says, then can immediately believe the opposite. Makes it simple.
Pessimistic Optimist
Observers believe security agency could act as a ‘sidekick’ of military.
Isn’t everything the sidekick of the military in a junta dictatorial government?
rkidlad
Good old Article 44 to the rescue again to protect Prayut’s ever-mounting insecurity. Where will it all end?
Which is an interesting point. What happens to Article 44, more importantly all areas affected by the article, when a proper government takes over?
Or will the successive government take this over and be able to use it as the junta have been using it?
YetAnother
ThaiVisa