
Thailand’s Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for actress Panadda “Bum” Wongphudee and her husband, Atip “Got” Anantawan, on November 5, 2026, in an investigation into alleged donation irregularities involving the Ongkorn Thamdee Foundation. Police are examining donations reportedly totalling 900 million baht.
Panadda, a television presenter and chair of the foundation, was named alongside Atip in an application submitted by the Economic Crime Suppression Division. The court granted the application after reviewing the evidence and case documents presented by investigators.
Officers from the Economic Crime Suppression Division and Crime Suppression Division subsequently deployed teams to locate and arrest Panadda and Atip.
Economic crime investigators allege that only 20% of the 900 million baht donated for the Ongkorn Thamdee Foundation had reached the foundation.
Police examining the financial trail reportedly traced more than 300 million baht into Panadda’s personal bank account and another 200 million baht into Atip’s account.
The investigation had already led police to seize or freeze assets belonging to Panadda and people close to her, including her husband, children and parents.
Family assets reportedly frozen in the Panadda investigation were valued at more than 100 million baht. They included three or four houses, several plots of land, 22 cars, six firearms and numerous designer goods.
Panadda’s lawyer, Ekkasit “Petch” Srisung, told reporters by telephone that his client had returned home and that he was with her.
According to Ekkasit, Panadda had been listening to a programme and was uncertain whether an arrest warrant had been issued or what was happening. She therefore decided to return home to collect herself.
“If the police want her or intend to arrest her, they can come to the house,” Panadda’s lawyer Ekkasit said.
Ekkasit described Panadda’s home as being in a housing estate in the Ram Inthra area, close to his law office.
Pol Lt Gen Nattasak Chaowanasai, commissioner of the Central Investigation Bureau, had earlier outlined efforts to build a case against people suspected of using money withdrawn from the foundation’s accounts for purposes other than those intended.
Nattasak emphasised that police were examining forensic evidence and the circumstances surrounding financial transfers. Investigators had consulted judicial officials and prosecutors to ensure that proceedings followed legal requirements.
Before the court’s decision, Nattasak had indicated that police expected to apply for arrest warrants by Friday.
Panadda’s letter requesting assistance would not influence consideration of bail, Nattasak stressed. Decisions would be based on the law and the circumstances of the case, with all parties treated equally.
Police are separately investigating a fraud complaint Panadda filed against Atip and a construction contractor known as "Ae”.
The Interior Ministry’s Department of Provincial Administration announced on November 5 that it had filed a separate police complaint over the Ongkorn Thamdee Foundation’s flood-relief fundraising.
The department reported finding Facebook appeals directing donors to a Kasikornbank account in the foundation’s name. Its examination of fundraising records found no application or permit issued to the foundation or its board.
According to the Department of Provincial Administration, public-benefit fundraising requires prior authorisation under the Fundraising Control Act of 1944. The department considered the appeal a potential breach of the first paragraph of Section 6, with penalties prescribed under Section 17.
Metropolitan Police Station for investigation into the foundation and any individuals involved. That complaint concerns fundraising authorisation, distinct from the investigation into the alleged misuse of donations.