It wasn’t clear exactly what he meant or whether he would limit that role to security matters, but his promise in 1999 to save the country from what he called “sham democracy”, and his decidedly undemocratic actions that followed, means that this comment cannot be easily dismissed.
As he campaigns for the polls, General Musharraf needs to clarify to the public his views on the military’s role in the kind of democracy, as flawed as it may be, that Pakistan is now trying to build.
Promises of better governance are all well and good, but in order to be taken seriously as a politician, he will have to prove that his views on civil-military relations have changed.
There is also the matter of the court cases pending against him, concerning, as they do, serious allegations including involvement in the murders of Benazir Bhutto and Akbar Bugti.
The judiciary will have to strike a tricky balance here: now that he’s back in the country, there is no reason General Musharraf should be let off the hook and not have to submit to the regular judicial process.
But going after him with unnecessary vengeance will only expose the judiciary to suspicions of trying to thwart his election campaign.
Military dictators more often than not consider themselves to be more popular than they are, so he is probably in for a bit of a reality check; the relatively low turnout at Karachi’s airport last week on his return from exile provided some indication of the struggle that lies ahead for the All Pakistan Muslim League.
But Musharraf has decided to re-enter electoral politics, and the court of the people can decide whether or not he is worthy of their vote even as the law takes its normal course.