Court to rule on anti-monarchy case against Pita, Move Forward on Jan 31

MONDAY, DECEMBER 25, 2023

The Constitutional Court said it will deliver a verdict in an anti-monarchy case against former Move Forward Party leader Pita Limjaroenrat and the party at the end of January.

The Office of the Constitutional Court said the court had interrogated two witnesses from the defence side on Monday and decided to set January 31 as the date of the verdict.

Pita and Move Forward leader Chaithawat Tulathon were the two witnesses interrogated.

Thirayut Suwankesorn, the complainant, had named Pita as the first defendant and Move Forward as the second defendant.

Court to rule on anti-monarchy case against Pita, Move Forward on Jan 31 In his complaint, Thirayut said that as Move Forward leader, Pita had proposed a bill to amend the Criminal Code’s Article 112 or the draconian lese majeste law.

Thirayut claimed the bill was cited in the Move Forward election campaigns, and that Pita and the party continued campaigning against the law.

He alleged that Pita and Move Forward’s actions were tantamount to seeking to overthrow Thailand’s constitutional monarchy.

After hearing Pita and Chaithawat’s testimonies, the court announced that the nine judges will meet at 9.30am on January 31 to deliver their individual decisions, which will be used for the final verdict to be read at 2pm on the same day.

Court to rule on anti-monarchy case against Pita, Move Forward on Jan 31 Pita is facing a second case filed by the Election Commission, asking the court to revoke his MP status on grounds that he held shares in iTV, a now-defunct media company, while applying to contest the May 14 election. The EC alleged that Pita had violated Article 101 and 98 of the charter that prohibited MP candidates from holding shares in a media firm.

The court will announce its verdict on this case on January 24.

Speaking to reporters after delivering his testimony in court on Monday, Pita declined to speculate on the results of the two cases.

All he said was that he had done his best to defend himself and the party in the two cases, adding that he had proposed an amendment to Article 112, as it was being wrongly used against political opponents.

Pita said if the court ruled in his favour, he would return to perform his duty as an MP. Otherwise, he would continue working for the party and the people without a political position.

()