This revised draft follows the public-hearing process conducted by the Thai Revenue Department (TRD) in July 2017, after the issuance of the second draft of the law. The original draft of the TP law was approved by the Cabinet back in May 2015.
Unfortunately, the revised draft of the TP law is not available to the public. We can, however, make certain assumptions based on the Cabinet minutes and the TRD’s responses to the public hearing process on the second draft of the law, which were posted on their website.
The revised draft law provides power to the TRD to reassess the taxable income and expenses of related party transactions to be consistent with the arm’slength principle. This requires that the pricing of related party transactions be based on the pricing which would have been agreed in transactions between independent parties.
As the TP law addresses the pricing of transactions between related parties to ensure that it is determined on an arm’slength basis, the definition of related parties is key to determining whether the law applies to a transaction in the first place.
The second draft of the law included a definition of related parties which focused on the shareholding relationship between the parties requiring a threshold of 50 per cent before the parties would be regarded as related.
The TRD has confirmed, however, that shareholding percentage is just one factor and there is room in the law to include others. For example, management control may be included as a factor.
The law will require two levels of documentation: (1) an annual report filed with the corporate tax return which provides information on the relationship between entities and the value of intercompany transactions; and, (2) transfer pricing documentation which would likely include the typical information – business description, functional analysis and the economic analysis – which addresses the selection and application of the appropriate transfer pricing methods for the related party transactions.
While it is expected that TP pricing analysis will be prepared at the time of entering into the related party transaction, to ensure that the pricing is arm’s length, taxpayers will have 60 days to provide the specified documentation to the TRD after request. The TRD will have five years to request the documentation after the tax filing for the year.
The rules will provide a revenue threshold in determining which companies are required to file an annual report.
This threshold will be specified in a ministeriฌal regulation, but will not be less than Bt30 million. It is not clear whether the same threshold would be applied for the TP docuฌmentation. Clearly, however, if the threshold is set at Bt30 million, not many businesses will be excluded.
Failure to file the report and/or TP documentation/evidence, or submitting incomplete/incorrect documents or evidence without justifiable reasons, will result in the taxpayer being subject to a fine not exceeding Bt200,000 per offence.
It is also possible that similar to other countries, the TRD may consider reducing or exempting penalty for the taxpayers who have prepared and submitted the required information/document within the period specified by the law.
Perhaps the biggest issue remaining, however, is what the effective date of the new law will be. The draft law presented to the Cabinet indicated that the new law would be effective for accounting periods commencing on or after January 1, 2017.
However, concerns were raised that the law would have retrospective effect given that it would be passed after the end of the 2017 year. The Ministry of Finance and the Council of State will consider this matter further.
Once the effective start date for the law is determined, the draft TP law will be submitted to the National Legislation Assembly for law enactment. With the imminent introduction of the TP law, taxpayers should ensure transfer pricing compliance.
Wellprepared, contemporaneous TP documentation not only serves as an efficient tool in preparing an annual report to be submitted with the annual tax return, but it could also put taxpayers in the better position to defend themselves with Revenue officers if and when the TP audit takes place; hence, reducing potential exposures and penalties.
Published : February 04, 2018
By : Special to The Nation Contributed by Stuart Simons and Kancharat Thaidamri,